Help me turn writing into a career, not just something I do on the side. Your paid subscription helps me carve out real time for essays — the deeper, slower pieces that I can take my time to write whilst I sip my Oolong in the morning.
Paid subscribers get early (and full) access to new essays, occasional behind-the-scenes notes on what I’m working through & monthly live guest speaker interviews. I hope you enjoy this article.
Big love,
SB x
There is a moment, just before you open your mouth, when the whole body leans forward. The jaw sets. The breath climbs into the chest. Someone at the table has said something you find wrong, half-formed, or simply different from what you hold to be true, and every cell in you wants to correct it.
Most of us were never taught what to do with that moment. We were taught to have opinions, to defend them, to speak up. We were told that silence is complicity. Very few of us were shown that silence can also be a discipline, a kind of power held in reserve.
This piece is about that moment. It is about discernment, the art of knowing when your voice is medicine and when it is noise. And it is about a quality I have come to call willful ignorance, a phrase usually thrown as an insult, which I want to reclaim as one of the more refined skills a human being can cultivate.
Two Kinds of Not Knowing
Blissful ignorance is the state of the child. You do not know what you do not know, and so nothing disturbs you. It carries a real sweetness, the ease of a body that has never been asked to hold complexity. It is also fragile. The first time life shows you what was hidden, the bliss cracks, and you cannot go back to it.
Willful ignorance, in the way I mean it, lives on the far side of that crack. You have seen. You know the argument is flawed, the opinion is half-baked, the person across from you is working from a smaller map than you are. And you choose, with full awareness, to leave it alone. Your eyes stay open while your mouth stays closed.
I want to be careful here, because I have written before about disavowal, the psychological habit of refusing to see what is in front of us so that we never have to act. That kind of looking away protects harm and lets it continue. The willful ignorance I am describing is its mature opposite. It sees everything, including harm, and it would speak in a heartbeat if harm were present. What it declines to do is spend its voice on matters where the only thing at stake is its own need to be right.
Me, Us, All of Us
The philosopher Ken Wilber, building on the moral psychology of Carol Gilligan, describes human development as a widening circle of care. The circle begins small and, given the right conditions, keeps expanding. Three of its stations are worth naming here.
The egocentric worldview is the world of me. My feelings, my perceptions and my needs sit at the centre, and everything else orbits around them. Every infant begins here, and it is entirely appropriate for an infant. In an adult it shows up as the person who experiences every disagreement as a personal attack.
